<< "Bash Here" | Home | Google Desktop: Index File Format >>

Google Desktop: Conspiracy Against Organized People

I have installed Google Desktop for four days now. The initial excitement has died down a little. The reality has started to set in: The thing is not going to work for me!

Why? Because I am organized. I have a meticulously crafted directory hierarchy based on the same principles that big research libraries use to organize their books. I have a habit of maintaining my files: putting them where they belong, deleting no longer needed files, archiving old files away, etc.

As a result, when I search for a word, say 'generics', most of the results are in my src/java/generics, src/c#/generics, doc/java/generics, and doc/c#/generics folders, all under my home directory. Of course, there are a few odd ball matches in other folders, e.g., temp/junk, but generally those are not what I want.

To really benefit from Google Desktop big time, you have to be really really disorganized: saving all your files in My Documents or the bin directory of the editor, saving all your email in Inbox, etc.

I've known a few people like that. They usually need help installing things themselves.

Google Desktop will be perfect for them, just as soon as I help them delete some old files, uninstall some old programs (including all of JDK 1.1.6, 1.2.1_05, 1.2.2, 1.3, 1.4.2_04, etc.) to make room for the Google Desktop index.

And I won't! :)



Re: Google Desktop: Conspiracy Against Organized People

Weiqi, I agree with your conclusion that if you are organized it's less useful. I do think the google desktop is useful though. Even if I just use it as a way to search Outlook, it works for me. In a blog entry of mine, I explained that it makes the most sense for windows since window's splatters your files all over the place. On my Mac, all files that I typically search are in my home dir so its not as useful.

Re: Google Desktop: Conspiracy Against Organized People

I disagree with the assertion that you have to be "really really disorganized" to really benefit big time.

For instance, I used the tool to find a code example from Chapter 7 of a book manuscript a few days ago. My files are very well organized, and I know that the example is in one of the chapters, but I couldn't remember *exactly* where it was. Before Google, I'd have to navigate to my well-organized folder, then open up each chapter one-by-one, making my best guess. The search engine saved me time.

I'm really looking forward to PDF indexing. I have a lot of PDF files - mostly technical specs and user manuals. It will be really nice to easily search through that content.

I don't care about the index size. It's insignificant compared to the amount of empty space on my $99 hard drive.

Re: Google Desktop: Conspiracy Against Organized People

I was exaggerating a bit. I'm sure in due time I will lean to love Google Desktop.

I'm looking forward to Thunderbird mail indexing, and possibly a Linux version.

Re: Google Desktop: Conspiracy Against Organized People

A hierarchical way is not the natural way a brain thinks and solves a problem . That's the reason google is so good and also why Yahoo's carefully created hierarchy is painful to use. After about 3 levels deep and 10 nodes my Brain simply gives up. What should my hierarchy be ? Reports ----> Project Name---->Report Type or Project Name ---->Status Reports.... I agree Google is going to destroy your meticulously crafted dir structures, but hey we don't use punch cards and rolodexes do we ? Cheers Ravi

Re: Google Desktop: Conspiracy Against Organized People

This thing may be revolutionary. And an organized way of life will be gone with the wind!

Better get on that disorganizational train, and surrender to Google. :)

Re: Google Desktop: Conspiracy Against Organized People

The problem with hierarchies is they only allow you to index in one dimension (does "java imaging" go under "java" or "imaging"). Since most of the things that I do are complex, I freuently need to file them/find them using multiple key words/indexes.

Add a comment